- Update all submodule URLs from gitea.centraal.wbd-rd.nl to gitea.wbd-rd.nl - Add settler as proper submodule in .gitmodules - Add agent skills, function anchors, decisions, and improvements - Add Docker configuration and scripts - Add manuals and third_party docs - Update .gitignore with secrets and build artifacts - Remove stale .tgz build artifact Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.9 KiB
1.9 KiB
name, description
| name | description |
|---|---|
| evolv-process-hydraulics-mass-balance | Engineer process hydraulics and mass-balance consistency across EVOLV nodes. Use when validating flow/volume/level relationships, retention-time assumptions, split/merge behavior, and physically plausible cross-node transport dynamics. |
EVOLV Process Hydraulics Mass Balance
Mission
Preserve physically coherent hydraulics and conservation behavior across interacting EVOLV process nodes.
Harness Execution Contract
- Build a flow and accumulation map from current node contracts.
- Define invariants before edits:
- no unplanned conservation breaks
- split/merge behavior remains deterministic
- retention/transport assumptions are explicit
- Validate with scenario-based balance checks.
Scope
nodes/reactor/nodes/settler/nodes/pumpingStation/nodes/valve/,nodes/valveGroupControl/
Workflow
- Identify control volumes and interfaces.
- Map inflow/outflow/storage terms and units.
- Validate steady-state and transient behavior under typical scenarios.
- Check edge cases: zero flow, reverse flow, surge, overflow.
- Confirm output contracts preserve balance observability.
Standards
- Keep units and sign conventions explicit.
- Avoid hidden source/sink terms.
- Document retention-time and mixing assumptions.
- Preserve existing contracts unless migration is defined.
Test Expectations
Cover:
- mass/volume conservation under nominal operation
- split/merge and bypass edge cases
- boundary condition behavior at zero/low/high flow
- numeric stability under long-run ticks
Deliverables
Return:
- balance model and assumptions
- changed files/tests with scenario evidence
- unresolved hydraulic risks and required field checks
Decision interview triggers:
- changes to balance assumptions affecting KPI/compliance outputs
- compatibility-breaking payload/topic changes for flow/volume data
- startup behavior changes with overflow/dry-run implications