Migrate to new Gitea instance (gitea.wbd-rd.nl)
- Update all submodule URLs from gitea.centraal.wbd-rd.nl to gitea.wbd-rd.nl - Add settler as proper submodule in .gitmodules - Add agent skills, function anchors, decisions, and improvements - Add Docker configuration and scripts - Add manuals and third_party docs - Update .gitignore with secrets and build artifacts - Remove stale .tgz build artifact Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -8,6 +8,12 @@ description: Drive code quality, regression prevention, and technical debt manag
|
||||
## Mission
|
||||
Raise delivery reliability by detecting defects early and systematically reducing technical debt in EVOLV nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Harness Execution Contract
|
||||
- Anchor findings to concrete file/line evidence.
|
||||
- Separate correctness risk from style preferences.
|
||||
- Require regression-proof evidence for fixes (tests that fail-before/pass-after when feasible).
|
||||
- Feed recurring failure patterns back into the relevant skill guidance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
- Node implementation quality in `nodes/<nodeName>/src/`
|
||||
- Editor/runtime contract consistency in `.html` + runtime wrappers
|
||||
@@ -50,3 +56,8 @@ Return:
|
||||
- test gaps and specific cases to add
|
||||
- debt backlog (now/next/later)
|
||||
- recommended refactors with expected payoff
|
||||
|
||||
Decision interview triggers:
|
||||
- tradeoff between delivery speed and known high-severity risk
|
||||
- acceptance of temporary risk with deferred remediation
|
||||
- testing scope reductions that materially raise regression risk
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
interface:
|
||||
display_name: "EVOLV Quality + Debt Engineer"
|
||||
short_description: "Drive code quality and technical debt reduction"
|
||||
default_prompt: "Review EVOLV code for defects, regression risk, test gaps, and maintainability issues; provide prioritized remediation."
|
||||
default_prompt: "Review EVOLV code with evidence-anchored findings, prioritize correctness and regression risk, require verification for fixes, and frame explicit decision-gate tradeoffs when risk is accepted or testing is reduced."
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user